Here's a selection of reasons from Bahamian commentators:
Felix Bethel (Bahama Journal): I knew (the PLP) was on a losing wicket as far back as May 3, 2002. The truth is they did not win the 2002 general election. The truth is that a tired and fractured FNM led by an exhausted Hubert Ingraham did what the tired and fractured sometimes do, which is drop the ball. The PLP lost because they refused to understand that that they did not win in May 2002.
Nicki Kelly (the Punch): There is little doubt that the PLP was the unwitting engineer of its own defeat. (Successes) were overshadowed by an indecisive prime minister reluctant to act on critical issues, the aura of scandal and corruption surrounding a number of government ministers and backbenchers, a land policy that favoured white foreigners, and allegations of thuggery, intimidation, fraud and racism during the election campaign.
P. Anthony White (the Punch): We must not forever tear the nation apart each time the election bill rings, setting Bahamian against Bahamian, using a wicked and wanton bait which can only incite to deep, deep hatred in the hearts of a people to whom hatred is far from native.
Vincent Ferguson (Bahama Journal): The PLP was remiss in its duty to lay the foundation of of a true and sustained democracy. It appears they were more concerned with arrogating power to themselves for personal gain and prestige. (This comment referred to the original PLP government, but we think it is just as apt today).
Catherine Kelly (the Punch): For once the Bahamian people walked their talk. They said the election would be close, and it was. They said they would vote for the candidate, not the leader, and they did. And they got exactly what they deserved: a balanced government.
Craig Butler (the Nassau Guardian): The PLP didn't have a cogent plan; the behaviour of some of the ministers and members; the PLP did a poor job with public relations; many (representatives) failed to keep in contact with their constituents; the PLP didn't have a person to play the role of a pitbulll; the PLPs message was lost in that they appeared to be answering the FNM; and too much time and effort was spent on Brent Symnonette; Perry Christie did not lead.
Oswald Brown (the Freeport News): Unquestionably the most unpredictable election in the history of the Bahamas. (Perry Christie) did not see anything wrong with offering several scandal-smeared candidates who, in any other democratic country, would have long ago been forced to close the book on their political careers. This was the ultimate insult to the Bahamian electorate. What kind of message was the prime minister sending to the young people of this country?
Ian Strachan (the Nassau Guardian): (Koed) Smith invited all the nation's bad boys to enter the welcoming arms of the compassionate, forgiving, turn-a-blind-eye, wink-wink, nudge-nudge PLP...Hubert Ingraham told his supporters to take their monety, jobs, scholarships, and still vote the PLP out.
Nassau Guardian editorial: The people went to the polls and declared that they do in fact trust Mr Ingraham to lead the country.
Tribune editorial: The people...are obviously tired of promises and government by committee. They are also tired of the scandals. This is the first election that we have witnesses in more than half a century that vote buying has been so public, so brazen, and with some candidates even trying to justify their insult to a people's dignity.
Andrew Allen (the Tribune): The biggest disappointment of the PLP government has been the seemingly lacklustre approach it has taken to matters involving the perception of corruption and scandal. Of the FNM it can be said that the the most striking strengths and weaknesses relate to the leadership style of the man at its helm.
Adrian Gibson (the Tribune): The Bahamian people rejected Perry Christie's government of broken promises, scandals and indisposition for one that they hope would be more productive, less ethically challenged and more decisive.
John Marquis (the Tribune): It was no surprise that the PLP was beaten. The only surprise was that it wasn't beaten badly. While Bahamians have moved forward into a bright new century the PLP has languished in the past, still nursing the same old prejudices, still resorting to the same thuggish tactics, and still expecting ordinary folk to bow to their might.
Sir Arthur Foulkes (the Tribune): In spite of everything, the PLP lost the election and the biggest loser was former prime minister Perry Christie. Mr. Christie was exposed as ineffective and weak during the last five years, and now he has the distinction of having led the first one-term administration in Bahamian history. But more than that, Mr. Christie’s pretense of being a democrat was stripped away by his refusal to do anything about all the unfair practices in the election and his personal participation in the abuse of ZNS.
John Farmer (Weblog Bahamas): In 2002, the new PLP administration started brightly, with Christie promising a code of ethics to guide his party’s conduct in office. It did not take long for the PLP to resume its original persona, with victimisation, nepotism, corruption, bribery, deceit and secretive governance the order of the day. Not to mention their abhorrent attempt to undermine the independence of the judiciary, and their attempts, once again, to usurp the will of the people at the ballot box.