On Print and Power

by Nicolette Bethel

There's an email making the rounds (I received it several months ago) entitled "Blacks Don't Read". Being Black, I read it. The general message of the email is simple and thought-provoking: one of the reasons African-Americans are still second-class citizens in their country is that they don't read.

The email isn't talking about illiteracy. It's talking about choosing not to read when one could choose to do so. And it's arguing that the consequences of making such a choice are, fundamentally, political.

In 2000, I sat down to watch a special episode of A&E's Biography on the 100 most influential people of the millennium: politicians, inventors, writers, artists, composers, religious leaders, soldiers. One by one the people I considered likely to be at the top of the list were eliminated, until at last I was stumped: who would be named the most influential person of the last thousand years? The answer: Johannes Gutenberg, inventor of the printing press.

Consider this. At that time, I was a COB lecturer in English, and was regularly astonished at the fact that so many of my students, like the African-Americans of the email, don't read. It's not that they can't read; it's that they choose not to. They see no use for reading. It's boring, they say. It's hard.

Now some would ask the question: what's wrong with that? In our culture, we communicate primarily by oral means, and place value on what people say, and on what we hear, rather than what we find out through print. As a result, we don't raise our children to place value on reading or writing.

Fair enough. But there's just one problem. In 2000, a bunch of thinkers in the most powerful country in the world picked the obscure inventor of the printing press to name the most influential person of the millennium. That suggests to me that it's not a question of culture. It's a question of power.

Think about it. The man who took a mechanical press designed to squeeze the oil out of olives, created movable type, and used that contraption to issue the first printed Bible was considered to be more influential than Gandhi, Hitler, or Columbus; than Newton, Einstein, or Freud; than Thomas Edison, Henry Ford, or Alexander Graham Bell; than Martin Luther or Martin Luther King, than Shakespeare, Leonardo Da Vinci, Michelangelo or the Wright brothers, than Bill Gates or whatever genius invented the Internet.

Why? Because one of the most basic foundations of power in the world comes from knowing information and controlling it.

Before Gutenberg's printing press, ideas were disseminated by word of mouth. The most important of them were preserved in writing. Laws were written, the Bible was written, and the names of people who had to pay taxes were written. But in a world without print, what was written was an arcane collection of information that only a limited number of people could see for themselves.

The printing press revolutionized the world by allowing ideas that were written to be reproduced so that more people could see them. In so doing, it also helped create a world which could be democratic, egalitarian and independent, because individuals had access to the information that empowered them.

In a world without print, the power that comes from knowing information and controlling it is concentrated in the hands of the very few. In a world without print, not many people read; even fewer write. In a world without print, most people rely upon a handful of educated people to keep them informed. The rest of society is at their mercy.

And to all intents and purposes, the Bahamas is a world without print. Publishers of Bahamian work are few and far between. Bahamian writers are the most obscure of all artists in the country. A full generation after Independence, there's no national library, no public collection of writing by and about our people that we can use to raise our children on, to give them an identity, a touchstone of print in a world where print is power. In our society, where money is spent lavishly on street festivals and fireworks for rallies, but frugally on books and artists and libraries. In our society, where opinion is formed in churches, at political gatherings, and on radio talk shows. We live in a world in which the printed matter we get is produced by other people, and not by ourselves.

And so we live in a society that has chosen to relinquish the power that comes from print. In this our society is much like the pre-Gutenberg world. Too many of us believe things and think things that other people have told us, and not things that we have proven for ourselves to be valid. When one reads a book, one has time to reflect, find other books, check facts, make up one's own mind. But when one listens to a speech or a talk show or a sermon, or watches news on TV, the ideas fly past so quickly that one cannot question them, and one is swept up in the emotion of the moment, and has far less control, over what one believes.

By rejecting any kind of real control over the products of print, we Bahamians have created a society that depends far too heavily for its information, its "truths", on a handful of powerful people. What's worse is very few of those powerful people are Bahamian. For by rejecting control over the products of print, we Bahamians have chosen not to produce much information of our own.

Oh, we'll consume it, all right, if it's marketed to us, and especially if it comes from abroad. Just look at how many of us flock to see Hollywood movies, spout what we have learned from CNN or Fox or NBC Nightly News, inhabit a world shaped by the North American media giant. But we don't produce our own information. The production and dissemination of ideas is not a "Bahamian" thing. We are an oral society, and everything we have to say is encompassed in Junkanoo.

I'll leave you with this. If print is power, where does that place us on the scale of power and influence in the global world?

Comments

[BBoyz]

Amen and Amen and Amen

[Read Bahamas]

Read Bahamas

[eno]

I've noticed that some people honestly don't have the _time_ to read. Well, they don't want to have the time to read. I know people who don't have a television yet their day to day activities don't have room in them for reading even a full page of a newspaper.

The best thing that ever happened to me was when I started reading the things I needed to read in order to perform my new job competently. Honestly, the only thing one needed to be considered suitable for this job was a willingness to read. Of course if my employers were allowed to freely bring in expatriates then the job requirements would have been much higher.

I remember an old friend of mine who I spent a lot of time talking to online via chat and e-mail. Not once did they ever speak in proper sentences and wherever possible their responses were 4 words or less. I opened one of our newspapers the other day and to my surprise almost half of the articles were written by this person. No wonder I read bahamapundit more than I read the papers.

[Karen]

A timely commentary NB. Many would blame the 'digital age' or 'television', but I wouldn't wholly agree with that. While I'm sure this has some influence, as with many things, a lot depends on the parents. And for various reasons, parents simply don't or won't take the time to read to very young children or encourage older ones to do so.

I don't live in The Bahamas at the moment, but I recently spent some time with my younger nieces and nephews there. As expected they're quite involved with their TV programmes and PlayStations, but of the 6 of them, only one of them reads for pleasure. They're all under the age of 11, they're all very intelligent, and apparently do well at school, but only the one can be counted on to always have a book close to hand.

I pointed this out to my siblings, and their response as to why their children won't read was generally 's/he doesn't like to read'. I recall one of them received a few books for her birthday last year, and she made no bones about the fact that she didn't like the gift. Her parents response? Nothing.

But I feel that the reason the one nephew enjoys reading so much, is that he spent much of his formative years with his grandmother - my mother - who instilled this love of reading in him as she did in all of us. To this day all, bar one, of the 5 of us continues to enjoy reading. So I don't understand why this wasn't passed on. I'd hope if I spent more time there, I could push it, but unfortunately that's not the case.

It's a real shame.

[Larone R. Fawkes]

Even more sadly is that those among us that are considered powerful and are not well read themselves, they may hold positions of influence whether religious or political, but cannot offer deep Philosophical discussions matters; hence the society is slowing descending to a mere primordial existence of living, where life is merely one of feeding, defecation and propagation.

Reading allows us to life above the threshold of animals; it allows us to come into the fullness of being humans, and to experience the fullness of God. The lack of it in our society explains why we lack depth and substance, yet still why we are dying as a people, as a society.

[Edward Hutcheson]

Required reading!